| 
						
						
						
						 
 
						Share of obligation by Ivan Donn Carswell 
						
						If the debate rages in the pages of the news today then I’m confused, I’ve searched and found no evidence.  Perhaps the anger of some residents about a Catholic school  that’s due to close because its roll has fallen lower  than the threshold for support is not the sort of news that sells.  That only tells me why it isn’t there. I heard it on the breakfast  show, a couple disembodied voices arched in anger, discussing  choices, arguing pros and cons until the show moved on.  Am I wrong to labour on the point? The closure of a school disjoints  the fabric of its neighbourhood, it isn’t good, the issue is a moot  of course – forever in dispute. So let us take a neutral  stance, was it an act of governance? Or just an oversight  of parents passing in the night? It’s not a symptom of the first,  I’m sure; the bureaucrats who hold the purse disport  themselves with thorough care, no error there unless  they changed the basic rules and never said. And that  they never did. So where can one assign the blame?  It’s not as if this came out of the blue, their teachers  knew as good, committed teachers always would,  so how they could discuss the case and miss the point  in team debate, not try to be proactive and precise,  just sit and wait for providence, or just be nice  and negligent, or argue with a precedent  that holds for all denies their share of obligation.  Their school will close for lack of diligence  on part of people meant to take an active role  and seek solutions to resolve their shared  duty of care, the answer’s there, and if they had  the issue would be dead. Instead we have  debate about a school’s avoidable fate  which condemns apathetic commitment  to their children’s education.  Let’s hope it’s not a symptom  common throughout our Nation. © I.D. Carswell						 
						
						
						
						
						 | 
						
 |